Mortgage and Real Estate Blog

head_left_image

BUYER MUST BE APPROVED BY XYZ MORTGAGE COMPANY. WHO BENEFITS?

Mortgages Unlimited - West St Paul Mortgage Broker and Mortgage Lender

Not my post - this is re-blogged, but well worth reading as it happens everyday. Unfortuntely, unsuspecting buyers are again being redirected to unscrupulous lenders who clearly do not have the buyers best interest in mind.

While the seller can mandate you get an approval letter from a specific lender - you DO NOT have to use that lender in the end, and in every single transaction I've seen cross my desk, MY DEAL BEAT the other lender hands down!

- Joe

Mortgages Unlimited provides home mortgage loans in Minnesota and Wisconsin only.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Via Lenn Harley, Homefinders.com, MD & VA Homes and Real Estate:

BUYER MUST BE APPROVED BY XYZ MORTGAGE COMPANY.  WHO BENEFITS?

What is behind all of the listings that say "buyers must be approved by "XYZ mortgage company". 

These third party lender requirements are included in about 1/3 of the bank owned listings.

EXAMPLES FROM A FEW LISTINGS FOR BANK OWNED PROPERTIES FOR SALE:

  • "pre qual from Wells Fargo (REQUIRED!!)"
  • "Pre-qual with Countrywide, free credit report and appraisal if Countrywide is used"
  • "BANK OF AMERICA PREQUAL REQUIRED"

PRE-APPROVAL, PRE-QUALIFIED, BREATHING.  We're used to this requirement in the listing remarks and generally don't object.  While our buyers are well qualified and our contracts prepared in great detail with pre-approval letters, financial statements, etc., we understand that many contracts received by listing agents are not.  Listing agents receive written offers that are incomplete and accompanied by so called "pre-approvals" where the only thing reviewed by the loan officer is the credit report.  Quite often the loan officer has not verified the money to close or income to qualify.  Once the listing agent receives our offer, they do not require third party lender pre-approval of our buyers.

A NEW TWIST ON AN OLD REQUIREMENT.  In consultation with a Maryland broker in my network yesterday, the broker related a situation that was very revealing.  While we're aware of this requirement stated in the AGENT REMARKS in many REO/bank owned property listings, this particular situation was very revealinLoan Applicationg.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.  We understand the need for the seller to feel comfortable with the buyer's ability to close.  However, this situation appeared to involve more than just verifying the borrowers ability to obtain a mortgage loan.  After contacting the loan officer named by the listing agent as the person to review the buyer's financial information, the buyer called and related the conversation.  There's something fishy in. . .

HOW FAR DOES A QUALIFYING LENDER GO??  The loan officer took the buyer's credit information and shortly, after reviewing the credit report told him that his credit was fine, however, to make sure that he got the contract, he should change his offer to include: 

  • a price of $xxx,xxx
  • remove the home inspection
  • etc., etc.

This, mind you, for a very, very well qualified home buyer with excellent credit scores, money to close and making a 106% offer with only a customary split of transfer and recordation taxes which is pre-printed in our contract of sale.  The buyer did, however, want a home inspection. 

WHAT'S UP, DOC?  This loan officer is NOT the bank/seller.  It is the loan officer identified by the listing agent to pre-approve the buyer.  Seems to me that this lender, and the listing agent/seller, went beyond the normal pre-approval by a third party lender requirement. 

The Maryland Association of Realtors Residential Contract of Sale includes a clause that states:

36. NOTICE OF BUYER'S RIGHT TO SELECT SETTLEMENT SERVICE PROVIDERS:  Buyer has the right to select Buyer's own title insurance company, title lawyer, settlement company, escrow company, mortgage lender or financial institution as defined in the Financial Institutions Article, Annotated Code of Maryland. 

WHAT PART OF "BUYER'S RIGHT" DO THEY NOT UNDERSTAND?  The loan officer clearly gave the home buyer the impression that, if his suggestions were followed, that the buyer would be more likely to be accepted by the seller.  What the buyer also got from the conversation was that this loan officer was not an objective third party lender. 

WHAT'S GOING ON?  Inquiring minds want to know.

*  Is the listing agent using their property listings to STEER buyers to a loan officer?

*  Is the loan officer giving the listing agent some benefit for these referrals?

Fortunately, the home buyer, an attorney, believed that the loan officer was going too far, broke off the conversation and immediately contracted his buyer's agent. 

QUESTION:  What action, if any, would you take or recommend that the agent take?  I'm a pro-active practioner and prefer to take advantage of any opportunity to enhance our buyer's position rather than sitting by an doing nothing.  I know what I would do. 

I value the experience and opinions of my ActiveRain friends, therefore:

Would you relate the conversation to the listing agent?

Would you notice the agent's broker of this conversation?

Would you do nothing? 

WHAT WOULD YOU DO???

 

1 commentJoseph Metzler MMS UMB • July 29 2009 01:29PM

Goodbye Timely Closings. Truth-in Lending rules change - MDIA Info

Mortgages Unlimited Minnesota

The new "Mortgage Disclosure Improvement Act" (MDIA) starts next week (July 30 2009) and will likely seriously delay closings - especially over the next few months as unprepared lenders everywhere drop the ball until they all get comfortable and familiar with the new APR (Truth-in-Lending) disclosures. 

Learn what you need to know by watching this quick video at http://www.thinkbigworksmall.com/mypage/player/tbws/12733/1110605

The Federal Reserve Board changes to consumer protection regulations for APR disclosure, while mandated with good intention, will certainly cause delays right at the last moment as FINAL numbers used to prepare the ACTUAL APR are not always known until the last moment. The new rules have such a tight tolerance that lenders will almost ALWAYS have to be redisclosed, and DELAY THE CLOSING while everyone waits for the 3 day waiting period to pass.

The Federal Reserve Board approved final rules that revise the disclosure requirements for mortgage loans under Regulation Z (Truth in Lending) . Regulation Z is a consumer protection regulation that requires lender disclosure of the cost of financing a home, and has been revised to provide greater consumer protection.  The revisions are an amendment to the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) called the Mortgage Disclosure Improvement Act (MDIA) .   The MDIA covers primary residences and second home applications made on or after July 30, 2009, and requires that lenders provide disclosures earlier in the mortgage process.   The MDIA requires the following waiting periods:

  • Lenders must give good faith estimates of mortgage loan costs ("early disclosures") within three business days after receiving an application for a mortgage loan (unchanged from current rules). The only fee that can be collected within this three day period is a nominal credit report fee.  
  • Lenders must wait seven business days after they provide these early disclosures before closing the loan (usually not a problem, as it takes longer than that to get every done anyway).
  • If there are any changes during processing to the terms or cost of the mortgage, lenders are required to give a new disclosure with a revised annual percentage rate (APR), and wait an additional three business days before closing the loan. A change that results in an increase to the APR of 0.125% requires re-disclosure. Closing can occur no sooner than three business days after re-disclosure. "Business days" include Monday - Saturday (excluding holidays).

The burden of proof is on the lender to deliver disclosures and most will not want to make exceptions in fear of closing a loan that is out of compliance.   Responsible lenders have already been doing this disclosure/re-disclosure all along. On most transactions, the actual increased time required to process loans due to MDIA may be three to seven days.  

Plan on additional delays in closing your next real estate transaction as lenders adhere to the new law. 

We are ready and fully prepared for the changes. Remember the lender choice reflects heavily on your future referrals. Once a deal is on the table, time becomes a critical factor.  Any delay or hiccup could mean that the deal doesn't get done.  There's nothing more frustrating than having a deal on the table that falls apart because it doesn't seem to be a priority to the lender who is too busy for your deal while he works on some refinances, or hasn't figured out the new laws.

That's why I make it a habit to make your problems, my problems; your obstacles become my obstacles.  And I work tirelessly to get your deals funded For properties in Minnesota or Wisconsin Only, 7 days a week, call (651) 552-3681, or E-mail me your questions.

- Joe Metzler, MMS

3 commentsJoseph Metzler MMS UMB • July 24 2009 10:54AM

What do you mean "why is it taking so long?" You're lucky it's closing!

 

Great post - and one worth Re-Blogging. This is NOT written by me, but it sure could have been!

 

Via Novation Mortgage:

(Warning: Not for babies or whiners :) [Unless you read it as it was written: the vent, the whole vent and nothing but the vent] If you plant your tongue firmly in your cheek while you are reading and go ahead and hit a great big old Cheshire Cat smile right now you will probably make it through this ... erm ... post.

Last week I closed an FHA purchase in 8 days from application to the closing table. It was a miracle. It happens. Last month I closed an FHA streamline refinance in 5 days. No joke. 5 days. It happens. Yesterday I had a call from a client wanting to know if we could close a Fannie Mae purchase by the end of this month - it's the 22nd. Uhm, no. 

First of all it's the end of the month and the 11,000 people who had their application, appraisal and documents in underwriting last week also want to close "by the end of this month". So the agent called me. Why? No idea - boy did he ever tell me a few things about my business and what a tool I am if I can't get a loan closed in 7 business days because HIS lender certainly could do it.

Why, then were they wasting time on the phone with me?

Ah, the buyer is self employed, has two other streams of income, owns 16 homes, is moving from a bigger house to a smaller one and the old one isn't sold and it's just down the street. Hmmmm ....

Let me state this for the record: Loan officers ocassionally lie. One of the things they lie about is their turn times. They like to say, "Our turn times are 48 hours". That may well be true - with absolutely no hiccups and a perfectly clean file submitted and an acceptable HVCC appraisal which will take a MINIMUM of 10 days to get back. Then there's the issue of middle lenders are sitting on files for days AFTER the approval because the secondary market won't purchase loans fast enough BECAUSE THERE IS A MONEY SHORTAGE. There, I said it.

There is a money shortage even with all the TARP money that went mostly to big banks. Guess what they did with it? THEY SAT ON IT AND GAVE EACH OTHER BONE BONE BONUSES. Okay, I know, I'm typing a lot in caps. You'll get that with people who have a long fuse when it gets down to the nib. And if I hear that snivelling weenie Barney Frank say one more time this is not his fault I'll fax him a picture of my bootie. No wait, better not.

One problem is with people, like Bozo the Barfly agent who obviously called me from the local watering hole, thinking they know how to qualify a borrower. "Man, Ken, I've known this guy for umpteen-eleven years. He took my baby sister to the prom back in 1988. He's a big time developer with a bazigillion jillion dollars. In 2006 he sent my whole family to Hawaii for a week. He owns a 36' SeaRay up on the lake. What's the problem?"

Pretty much everything you have told me is the problem. At best this is going to take 30 days because, believe it or not, people who can fog a mirror and have nothing more than a good story can no longer borrower money BECAUSE THEY DON'T PAY IT BACK! As I have written at least once before during the last 4 years just here on AR - the stupid loans for stupid people are going, going, GONE! Now it is an across the board requirement to PROVE everything. Regardless of what "your lender" says. (Especially that lender - rhymes with GunRust.)

Then there's this little thing called "buy and bail". Haven't heard of it? It's where people buy a smaller house they can afford, move out of their bigger house they cannot afford and let the bigger house go or file bankruptcy! Then there is the very high likelhood that Mr. Country Club the mega-developer took about the same amount of a paycut over the last 24 months as yours truly - making us both suitable for the soup line.

So STOP GIVING ME CRAP about how long it takes to close a loan and for PETE'S SAKE SHUTUP ABOUT "YOUR LENDER"!!!! I know you called me last even though I can do things that make Countrywide, Ditech, Wells Fargo and Chase spit burning nails. I even do it faster and less costly - always could, still do.


If you have any issues with my comment please see my manager, Lenn Harley. Thanks, bye.

0 commentsJoseph Metzler MMS UMB • July 24 2009 08:46AM

Zero Down Payment in Zip Code 55106

 

First time homebuyer grant and assistance program allows you to get
ZERO Down Payment in ZIP code 55106 to buy your first home!

It is the dream of everyone to own their own home. Many potential home buyers have the income and credit to qualify for a mortgage. However, many lack the one essential ingredient to make homeownership a reality; the up-front money needed for down payment and closing costs. 

If you want to buy a home in area code 55106 (East Side of St Paul, Minnesota - Ramsey County), we have access to a special program that will GIVE YOU YOUR DOWN PAYMENT. This down payment and closing cost assistance program is a bona fide gift to homebuyers. There is no obligation to the homebuyer to ever pay it back as long as they live in the home 7-years.

PLUS, you still qualify for up to $8,000 in first-time homebuyer tax credits if they buy BEFORE 12/1/2009.

Call (651) 552-3681 right now to get started.

Apply online - zero down payment in zip code 55106 - the eastside of st paul minnesota

             

 

0 commentsJoseph Metzler MMS UMB • July 20 2009 07:28AM

White House widening mortgage refinance relief program to 125% LTV

Mortgages Unlimited First time home buyer in west st paul minnesota

WHITE HOUSE WIDENING MORTGAGE REFINANCE RELIEF PROGRAM

The Obama administration has made changes recently to the current homeowner bailout program available to homeowners who are underwater on their home mortgage loans in an effort to stem the foreclosure problem.

The program is designed to allow homeowners to refinance to today's lower interest rates when under normal and traditional underwriting guidelines, they would not be able to do so.

The current program would allow strapped borrowers with mortgages up to 105% of their homes value as long as they were not behind on their mortgages. The changes just made allow borrowers to now have up to 125% loan-to-value and still be able to refiance.

BUT HOLD ON. While this sounds great on the surface, and while there has been a lot of consumer interest, the program has not come even close to expectations, helping significantly fewer people than Washington anticipated. It is because of these failures that they have expanded the loan-to-value limits.

This programs failures comes on the heals of two previously highly announced homeowner bailout programs called FHASecure and Hope For Homeowners, which both failed miserably in helping consumers.

Why do they fail? A huge issue on the current program has been that so many people owe more than 105% of the current value of their home. So this change should help qualify more people.

With this and the other programs, there is no lender mandate forcing lenders to participate. Many lenders understand giving people 100% (or higher) loans were part of the original problem, and simply refuse to offer the loans.

Underlying guidelines, shall we say "the small print" is also preventing many people from taking advantage of these programs.

In the end, while this announcement should help many more people, I also see this program being labeled a failure.

NOTE: If you previously tried refinancing, and you were OVER 105%, but UNDER 125%, please contact us to APPLY AGAIN! (we lend in MN, and WI only)

For more information on the "Making Homes Affordable Program", simply follow this link:

http://joemetzler.com/making_home_affordable_program.htm

 

0 commentsJoseph Metzler MMS UMB • July 02 2009 08:00AM